-increasing R&D Investments<\/p>\n\n\n\n
-increasing Team and Ressource consumption<\/p>\n\n\n\n
-Trend of increasingly improving EPS (Earnings Per Share)<\/p>\n\n\n\n The 1 hour chart shows a consolidation in the last 59 days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Price range: 13,8 – 19,6$<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n The slight downward trend was broken on July 17th.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Analysts price the stock at 16$, so at the moment it is overpriced by 2,83$.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The 4 hour chart indicates a soon swing upwards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The chart shows a periodic movement upwoards with gaining volume.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The period is about 66days, which is due on the 28th July.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Buy – strong Buy recommendation<\/mark> by independent analysts (https:\/\/www.quiverquant.com\/stock\/QBTS\/forecastyahoo finance).<\/p>\n\n\n\n I agree with that recommendation,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite my belief in a short-term gain to about 25$. I rather think of it as a long-term chance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n D-WAVE is confident that its cash balance ($300 million ), is enough to reach profitability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n With the current developments, I believe that to be in a couple of years (approximatly 2027).<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Combined with the increasing R&D expenditure of D-Wave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I see a good hold till profitability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Facts: -currently not profitable -increasing R&D Investments -increasing Team and Ressource consumption -Trend of increasingly improving EPS (Earnings Per Share) The 1 hour chart shows a consolidation in the last 59 days. Price range: 13,8 – 19,6$ The slight downward trend was broken on July 17th. Analysts price the stock at 16$, so at the […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":119,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1585653103_d-wave_systems_logo_story-e1753777454357.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":461,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108\/revisions\/461"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-20-205838.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/physicseconomy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-20-210543.png\")
\n\n\n\nCareful: Own Opinion<\/mark><\/h3>\n\n\n\n